Terri’s Legacy Lives–The World Remembers
Posted on Sunday, 30 of March , 2008 at 8:11 pm

COMMENTARY
By
Terri Schiavo had committed no crime. She was disabled, she just received food and water in an alternative manner than the norm. Judge George Greer, the executioner, had even refused to allow that Terri be given food and water by natural means after the feeding tube had been removed. Florida Statutes specifically prohibit anyone from denying an individual food and water.
Many called it court-sanctioned murder and it has set a dangerous precedent for the rest of the country that family members or guardians who believe an individual can no longer be productive in society can simply get a court order to end their life.
Terri Schiavo had collapsed at her home under suspicious circumstances in 1990 at age 26 after a day of argument with her husband. After he received more than $2 million from medical malpractice settlements, he withdrew all rehabilitation services from Terri and petitioned the Probate Court of Sixth Circuit Court Judge Greer to withdraw her feeding tube, willfully and intentionally causing her death by dehydration over a torturous 13 days as the whole world watched, preposterously claiming that it was Terri’s wish to die that way.
Although she left no living will, after he received the money, he suddenly remembered that 10 years earlier she had made a statement that she would not want to be kept alive by artificial means, a self-serving hearsay statement which Greer endorsed as clear and convincing evidence as the basis to sanction judicial homicide even though her family and close friends disputed the claim.
Her parents, Mary and Robert Schindler Sr., brother Bobby and sister Suzanne battled Michael Schiavo in court for nearly 10 years, arguing that she was not in a persistent vegetative state as Greer decreed and that she would not want to die in such a manner.
Although Congress passed a bill on Palm Sunday in 2005 and President Bush had quickly signed it into law that would grant Terri’s family a de novo review of their case in the federal courts, there was no de novo review. The legislative intent of the bill was for the feeding tube to be reinserted while the matter was reviewed in the federal courts.
However, the courts refused to grant an injunction to stop Greer’s death order and the family did not receive the full review of the case in the court as Congress and the President intended. Her parents repeatedly met with defeat in the courts in their efforts to save their daughter’s life.
Michael Schiavo said that she would not want to live by artificial means. However, Terri’s demonstrated will to live strongly dispelled that assertion and was grounds by itself for the reinsertion of the tube.
Terri’s brother explains that his sister’s case “was not about someone’s ‘right to die’ as it was portrayed by Schiavo, his attorney, euthanasia advocate George Felos, the mainstream media and others, nor was it an ‘end-of-life’ issue as is so often reported. “Heinous criminals on death row have more protection and are treated with more dignity than people like Terri”, Bobby Schindler says. “Congress saw this and intervened to protect her. Not only was it appropriate for Congress to try and help Terri, but it is what they are morally obligated to do in such cases”.
Terri’s siblings read a public statement three years ago today, in front of Woodside Hospice in
Category: Disabled, Family, Florida, Health, Media, Nationwide, Opinion, Religion, Schiavo
- Add this post to
- Del.icio.us -
- Meneame -
- Digg
COPYRIGHT 2007 - NORTH COUNTRY GAZETTE All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the express written permission of the publisher.






