Originally Posted - April 2, 2007




return home

Court: Liverpool School Violated 4th Grader's Rights

SYRACUSE---A federal district court has ruled that school officials of the Liverpool School District violated a fourth grader's free speech rights and denied her equal protection by refusing her request to distribute religious flyers constituting her "personal statement" during non-instructional time.

The court also ruled that the school's literature distribution policy is unconstitutional. http://lc.org/attachments/order_bloodgood.pdf

In 2004, when the student, Michaela Bloodgood, was a student at Nate Perry Elementary School in Liverpool, she asked permission to give a flyer that she wrote to her friends and classmates during non-instructional time. The flyer stated: "Hi! My name is Michaela and I would like to tell you about my life and how Jesus Christ gave me a new one. I asked Him to come into my heart and save me from my sins. This is what He has done for me. 1) Jesus Christ helped my parents decide to get remarried in November and then I will get to see my Dad everyday. 2) He helped me memorize Bible verses and say them in front of my church. 3) He helped me learn piano and play psalms and hymns and sing with grace in my heart to the Lord. 4) God cared enough for me that He gave me victory over thinking about something bad that happened to me. 5) Now that I am saved, God gave me peace in my heart and the truth that I am going to heaven instead of the other place. Praise the Lord."

School officials insisted that Michaela could not distribute the flyers because of the potential for divisiveness, litter and that students might believe the school was endorsing a religious message. The school banned all literature distribution by students.

Michaela was represented by Liberty Counsel of Orlando, Fla., whose lawsuit contended that the school cannot totally ban literature distribution by students during non-instructional time, any more than it can ban verbal communication, without violating the First Amendment.

The 46-page district court opinion issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Norman Mordue stated that "none of the reasons the District articulated for denying [Michaela's] request indicate more than undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance, which is not enough to overcome the right of freedom of expression." The opinion also stated that "the Court cannot say the danger that children would misperceive the endorsement of religion is any greater than the danger that they would perceive a hostility toward religion as a result of the District's denial of [Michaela's] request to distribute her flyers."

Mathew D. Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and dean of Liberty University School of Law, commented: "Religious speech is constitutionally protected, even in the public schools. School officials had no right to silence Michaela's personal Christian testimony." Staver concluded, "Michaela was simply attempting to express to her friends how Jesus changed her life. She has every right to express her religious views at school, and that right has been vindicated." 4-2-07

© 2007 North Country Gazette


COPYRIGHT 2007 - NORTH COUNTRY GAZETTE
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
without the express written permission of the publisher.