| |
|
|
Originally Posted -
April 18, 2007 |
|

|
return home |
NYS Judicial Panel Calls For Resignation Of Chairman Felder
|
|
ALBANY---The members of the New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct have unanimously expressed their loss of confidence in the
judgment and leadership of the chair of the Commission, Raoul Felder.
Felder, a Manhattan attorney, did not participate in the session of
commission members seeking his resignation.
“As the agency of government charged with the serious and sensitive
task of reviewing allegations of misconduct against judges throughout
New York State, and ultimately determining whether to remove a judge
from office, the Commission must at all times be and appear to be an
example of probity and discretion, as well as independence, integrity
and impartiality, the very qualities we require of our judiciary. It
is especially important for the chair, as one of two individuals
authorized to represent the Commission publicly and officially, to
embody and promote these qualities”, the statement reads.
Felder has co-authored a book with Jackie Mason entitled “Schmucks!”
which has a subtitle of “Our Favorite Fakes, Frauds, Lowlifes, Liars,
the Armed and Dangerous and Good Guys Gone Bad.”
“We expect all members of the Commission, and especially the chair, to
forgo certain rights and privileges in order to avoid impropriety and
the appearance of impropriety and to maintain the trust and confidence
of the public and the judiciary. The chair is not free, for example to
express publicly, even in his private capacity, opinions that might
reasonably cast doubt on the Chair’s or Commission’s ability to be and
appear fair and impartial, or opinions that undermine the integrity
and dignity of the office of chair.
“Commission members have a simple choice: accept certain limitations
on speech and actions as a condition of service, or decline the
position. Mr. Felder himself has publicly stated that his role as
Commission Chair required him to act with “sobriety” and to “be more
dignified.”
The commission’s loss of confidence in Felder’s judgment is rooted in
the book. “Much of the material in this book, and the work as a
whole, undermine the appearance of impartiality, and the dignity and
probity that is required of the commission and its chair”, the panel’s
statement says. “Although the book purports to be a work of humor,
much of it is crude, biased, vulgar and otherwise demeaning”.
“The book repeatedly invokes racial, ethnic and religious invective.
Such statements are inconsistent with the Commission’s role in
enforcing the judicial obligations to refrain from words or conduct
that manifest bias based on race, religion or national origin, and to
require court employees and lawyers to refrain from such conduct”, the
statement said.
“The book asserts that “anytime you hear the word ‘allegedly,’ you can
bet it’s true.” Such a viewpoint is untenable from a Commission member
whose role is to evaluate allegations of judicial misconduct and
identify those that have merit. The book claims that “nothing in our
country is more insidious than affirmative action.” Such a sentiment
raises a reasonable perception that the speaker could not pass fair
judgment on anyone he perceived to have benefited from affirmative
action”, the statement continued.
“The point here is not to inhibit anyone’s right to publish under the
First Amendment but to assure the bench, bar and public that the
Commission’s decisions are fair and impartial, and that they are not
driven by anyone’s biases. This book by the Commission’s Chair
seriously undermines that perception”.
The statement said that the panel was exploring its options in
removing Felder as chair.
Gov. Eliot Spitzer says that Felder should resign. Felder has
maintained that his free speech rights are protected by the First
Amendment but Spitzer said that “he does not have a First Amendment
right to be chair of the Commission on Judicial Conduct”
Felder had been appointed to the panel by former Gov. George E.
Pataki. His term expires March 31, 2008.
“By virtue of having that position, he accepts certain limits upon his
own behavior, just as judges do. Just as other elected or
governmental individuals do, whether appointed or elected”. 4-18-07
© 2007 North
Country Gazette
|
|
|
|
|
COPYRIGHT 2007 - NORTH COUNTRY GAZETTE
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the express written permission of the publisher. |
|
 |
|